Monday, August 13, 2012

Ending Medicare As We Know It


I’m probably going to vote for Obama this year. It’s mostly, I confess, a vote against Republicanism: that shameless (and to me loathsome) brand of politics that ignores the fact that Republicans created the mess they now pretend to despise, that they spent three years preventing Democrats from doing anything about it, and now campaign as if they are the ones who will “Save America.” It is so staggeringly hypocritical that it would be laughable if it didn’t look like they might get away with it..

But I can’t say I am any longer much of a fan of Barak Obama. He has been a disappointment. I credit him with taking a first stab at dealing with the health care mess, but even there the focus was mostly on coverage rather than costs, which I believe to be the cause of the coverage problem. But still, he got us a bit closer, I think, to a solution.

Beyond that, it’s hard to see what he did with all the advantages he had – and to an extent still has. His lack of success is not all his fault, of course., but in the end the buck stops there: he had the chance, he had the power and momentum, and yet could do little with it. The result is that he is now running a truly awful campaign, a campaign in which we are told over and over (for example) that Ryan budget plan would “end Medicare as we know it.” Is that supposed to be a bad thing? Medicare “as we know it” MUST end. It is bankrupting America. We have got to find a way make Medicare and Medicaid and medical costs generally, manageable. Obama, of all people knows that. But he has chosen, for political ends, to hammer away at a slogan that has no purpose other than to scare people and that will only make coming up with a solution even more difficult. Alas, the politics of hope.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Heartily agree with your assessment of the modern GOP. What an awful bunch.

I'm willing to cut Obama more slack than you, though, considering: A. Just how bad a situation he inherited*; and, B. the mindless tenacity of the Republicans' obstruction efforts**. The latter reminds me of the occasional story of a pit bull or gator that's killed while its jaws are attached to its poor prey, and the responding EMTs have to practically dynamite the thing off.

* - An economy shrinking at a pace of nearly 10%? Yikes.

** -- So many examples. Personally, I like the Heritage Institute telling everyone, "You know that 'individual mandate" thing we proposed in the 90s? Ignore that - we must've been shooting up straight Marxism then. Our bad... But you can trust us now!"

Anonymous said...

I like the commentary Bill. I reserve till we have face to face debate and we get more specifics in plans and policies. both sides are using scare tactics sadly. when they skip the spin and give me the facts I'll feel better with my final decision. Dave r

Billy Bob said...

I don't disagree with anything you've said, Bill, and your friend's comments on the Heritage Foundation are also spot on.

I think the heart of the problem with modern politicians is the modern electorate. Anyone who proposes honest solutions to, primarily, our financial challenges will not be elected because what's needed is broad, if not deep, sacrifice. Until the electorate stops embracing sound bites from both sides, we're never going to get anything more substantial.

The GOP has probably pushed this trend the farthest, but Obama's recent graphic demonstrating that it takes 125 middle income families paying $2,000 more to give one millionaire a $250,00 tax break belies the fact that the millionaire is contributing much, much more to our nation than those who make less. They do have the ability to pay more, but we need to express, especially when asking them to increase their contributions, intense gratitude rather than demonizing them for their success.

I don't know how we fix things, but the intense, vitriolic, and hypocritical responses to Obamacare don't bode well for other challenges where there's not a middle road that's been, at one time or another, proposed by both parties.

Perhaps what we need to address serious problems with serious solutions is a second term president. It seems only someone not campaigning can do much good.